On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:34:31PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: >On 26/09/2012 2:32 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: >>> On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote: >>>>>>> In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we >>>>>>> should keep cygwin's purpose as a base system, which is as full, and >>>>>>> as easy, and as close to a *nix environment as possible. >>>>>> And the wonder of open source is that you don't have to just offer >>>>>> opinions. You can actually offer changes which implement your brilliant >>>>>> ideas. >>>>> But that makes it like work and you know how we all don't have time to >>>>> give to open source projects. It's a wonder any open source project >>>>> exists with such lack of available time about. I barely have the time >>>>> to respond and read to list mail. Now you expect me to contribute!? >>>>> Sheesh. ;p >>>> Sorry. Now I feel bad for wasting your time with my email. >>> Pretty sure he's being sarcastic, though it may be exactly what some other >>> folks are thinking... >> Oh, Ryan, you don't know Chris very well. He was giving sarcasm as well. :D >Touch?? :)
No inappropriate touching please. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
