On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote: >> In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we >>should keep cygwin's purpose as a base system, which is as full, and >>as easy, and as close to a *nix environment as possible. > > And the wonder of open source is that you don't have to just offer > opinions. You can actually offer changes which implement your brilliant > ideas.
But that makes it like work and you know how we all don't have time to give to open source projects. It's a wonder any open source project exists with such lack of available time about. I barely have the time to respond and read to list mail. Now you expect me to contribute!? Sheesh. ;p -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
