On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:29:27PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >On 4/28/2012 8:51 PM, Nick Lowe wrote: >> "I installed 2.772 on my systems as soon as it was available and I >> don't see any such issue using my local mirror. Did you try another >> mirror?" >> >> Quite, but the idea of corruption was implicit in that question. A >> digital signature would rule that out. > ><snip> > >Not in this case, no. You inferred the wrong thing from the quote >above. Corinna's suggestion was that the mirror containing the packages >was malformed in some way, not that that 'setup.exe' itself was >somehow corrupted. > >> What's with the hostility? It's really bad etiquette... ;) > >That would be <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#WJM>. It makes life more >livable. :-)
Or, it could also be that hostility was inexplicably inferred where none was intended, i.e., "We're communicating on the internet!" cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
