I forgot to add, it also needs to be signed by a trusted root for it to be useful to most people.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Lowe <nick.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > "I installed 2.772 on my systems as soon as it was available and I > don't see any such issue using my local mirror. Did you try another > mirror?" > > Quite, but the idea of corruption was implicit in that question. A > digital signature would rule that out. It was only a suggestion to > ensure that that would never be a possibility. > > What's with the hostility? It's really bad etiquette... ;) > > Nick -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
