> Can't really parse that sentence. Then load your English parser.
> I haven't detected any "picking on" but then I can't claim to have > written the fhandler* code anymore Corinna has rewritten most of it. I > do know that if you want to be taken seriously you really need to send a > concrete suggestion/patch. I don't know the right answer to the problem. BUT... I have shown how to do achieve similar results to the dll, but with significantly less overhead. So... the person who cared to improve his/her/its code would say, "Well we use NTOpenFile() because it does the blah blah extra functionality that FindNextFile()/GetFileAttributes() do not." Then we could look to other Win32 APIs to try to achieve those results. For example opening a file on Windows for the purposes of stat()ing a file is dumb, considering the way most Windows Virus Scanners work. > So far, it seems to me that you're basically thinking out loud and > expecting us to fill in the blanks. That's not an effective way to > getting anything changed. Yes, thinking out loud is an effective way for a team to work together. You should try it.... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
