On 30/05/2010 22:39, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If someone
> is ingenuous enough to make an improvement it's hard to believe that
> they wouldn't be ingenuous enough to send a patch to cygwin-patches.
No, it isn't. (I'm assuming you meant ingenious rather than ingenuous,
because it doesn't make sense the other way.)
> Or, if they are ingenous enough but just like to lurk in the cygwin
> mailing list so that they can send private email with secret patches
> then I'd have to suspect the quality of the patch itself.
That's the same-but-opposite as an argument from authority fallacy.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
