On Sat, 3 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:

> On Sat, 3 May 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > On 2025-05-03 12:45, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > > Previously, Xu Chiheng offered ITA for llvm, however, we haven't heard
> > > > from him in over a year.
> > > >
> > > > Recently, I could successfully build llvm/clang related packages version
> > > > 20.1.2 thanks to MSYS2 guys.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, I would like to adopt these packages.
> > > >
> > > > NOTE: ocaml-llvm could not be built because ocaml related packages are 
> > > > too
> > > > old.
> >
> > > We're making good progress on getting patches for Cygwin merged upstream.
> > > I'm updating the latest in 
> > > https://github.com/msys2/MSYS2-packages/pull/5368
> > > including a 'README-patches.md' to track the status of the patches. I'd 
> > > like
> > > to see the git repos on these packages updated, but I don't know the 
> > > process
> > > here.  Also, I'd bet that having at least a test version of llvm would be
> > > helpful to the rust effort (I think msys2 is being used at this point, at
> > > least the bug report that llvm-config wasn't work went there instead of
> > > here).
> >
> > and as a maintainer (of other packages), you can modify and push to the
> > playground branches, which will run Scallywag CI jobs;
> > and/or as these packages are orphaned, you may adopt them with an email to
> > apps
> > "[ITA] mingw64-x86_64-/llvm", preferably including links to repos and
> > Scallywag CI jobs, then as owner modify and push to any branches.
>
> I don't want to step on Takashi's toes, plus I'm having issues with
> iostreams on Cygwin that it sounds like he's not so I need to reconcile
> with his patches as well.  (By "on Cygwin" I mean it works fine for me on
> MSYS2, so it seems like a gcc4 C++ ABI thing).

Takashi: if you push your current state to playground (or another branch)
I can look at updating the patches from what was merged upstream.  Also,
I'd then have an llvm to try to build & package lld against.

Reply via email to