On 12/03/2024 18:49, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps writes:
But I'm not being oblique here. I really do want comments.

Well, adding comments or proper POD is about the same effort, so I'd
tend towards the latter.

I'm not sure what's so astounding about the suggestion that a fifty
line script should have some comments in it that you can't believe I
mean that literally...

As the saying goes: Communication is possible, but improbable…

Well, OK.  This is less useful to people who actually want to use it,
though, requiring them to know that
"DWARF_PARSE=/usr/share/cygport/tools/dwarf-parse.pl" is the right
incantation.

Perhaps "DWARF_PARSE=1" could be a shorthand for that?

I don't see why not, it just requires one extra test.


Regards,
Achim.

Am I wrong or this patch was never merged/updated ?

Regards
Marco

Reply via email to