Hi all, On 7/26/2016 8:27 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
You could define a package "fuse" with no contents and a dependency on package "winfsp-fuse". Then later when/if another FUSE implementation becomes available, "somebody" could replace the "fuse" package with whatever is required to get alternatives support for the variants.
Does setup.exe already have a provision in the GUI to ask the user which one they want to chose if two or more packages are able to provide the (empty) fuse package?
I'm wondering if "fuse-xxxx" is a better name template than "xxxx-fuse" in order to keep the variants near each other in setup.exe's displays.
good point. Herbert Stocker
