>As I said, I'm not going to refuse your package. I was just pissed >about this discussion in conjunction with my (now) obvious >misunderstanding that we're talking about two forks of the same code. > >Please go ahead as planned,
Thanks. As I see it there are the following options: - Accept/reject the current FUSE package as it has been submitted or with requested corrections, fixes, etc. However the package has received no plus/minus votes at this time. - Rename the package to winfsp-fuse, but have it somehow “satisfy” packages that require “fuse” (e.g. SSHFS, FUSEPY). This would allow multiple *-fuse packages to exist in the setup database and the user chooses which one they want. My understanding based on Marco’s answer is that this is not currently supported by Cygwin’s dependency system. Bill
