On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 17:11 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 7 15:01, Jon TURNEY wrote: > > On 04/09/2015 15:03, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Sep 4 14:56, Jon TURNEY wrote: > > >>xwinwm: I think this can be classed as a 'failed experiment' > > > > > >What does that mean in terms of the cygwin-pkg-list? > > > > I guess it means that we won't make a 64 bit package. > > > > Making xwinwm obsolete doesn't make much sense until the support for it in > > xserver is removed, which I plan to do eventually. > > But we could remove it from cygwin-64bit-missing, isn't it, Yaakov?
I'd prefer to leave it in until Jon decides to drop it entirely. -- Yaakov