On Sep 4 14:56, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 03/09/2015 16:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Sep 3 15:55, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >>On 22/07/2015 11:08, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >>>On 7/20/2015 8:16 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote: > >>>>On 15/07/2015 15:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: > >>>>>I spent a bit of time checking the real situation of the packages > >>>>>still missing as 64 bit port. > >>>>>After xdelta, bsdiff and iperf porting, without counting the few mingw > >>>>>ones, the duplicates we are down to ~44. > >>>>> > >>>>>Please see here the analysis : > >>>>>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Hn7Eaq6djEN9X0jS_AM8-DH_LvP43G9_DXnpTt09Asc/edit#gid=0 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>I have built a 64-bit dmalloc for my personal use, so I can ITA if > >>>>Pierre is no longer interested in maintaining dmalloc. > >>>> > >>>>The last upstream release was in 2007, so it can probably be classified > >>>>as 'mature' :D > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Pierre, > >>>any feedback ? > >>>(assuming you are not in Vacation) > >>> > >>>Regards > >>>Marco > >> > >>I guess we should consider Jon to be the new maintainer > > > >ACK. > > Done. > > A few comments on other stuff on that list: > > rxvt: I think we should make this obsolete.
ACK. > xwinwm: I think this can be classed as a 'failed experiment' What does that mean in terms of the cygwin-pkg-list? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpLh7eL0wV44.pgp
Description: PGP signature
