On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 18:16 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 17 18:01, Achim Gratz wrote: > > In fact if we do that, I'd like to require either new releases for the > > packages using /etc/rebase/dynpath.d or alternatively that they get an > > additional package that drops just this file (if a full release _now_ > > would be too much work) and the requisite change to setup.hint to have a > > dependency added so that this new package gets pulled in. > > That should be fine, given the rather short list of affected maintainers: > > octave Marco Atzeri > perl Reini Urban/Achim Gratz ?!? > php Yaakov Selkowitz > python Jason Tishler/Yaakov Selkowitz > R Marco Atzeri > ruby Yaakov Selkowitz
Some of these -- php and python at least -- do not have separate 'site' and 'vendor' extension directories, so adding a directory entry for these would pick up DLLs that are already registered with setup's database. How would you avoid duplicates (and hence wasted imagebase space) in this case? Yaakov
