On Mar 28 20:51, Andy Koppe wrote: > On 28 March 2013 14:12, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Mar 28 15:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Mar 28 14:05, Andy Koppe wrote: > >> > On 28 March 2013 13:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> > > Hi guys, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > right now it's only possible to build a 64 bit package using the native > >> > > toolchain. Yaakov is working on a 32 bit cross toolchain, but this > >> > > may take another couple of days. > >> > > > >> > > Anyway, the latest 64 bit Cygwin DLL seems to be stable enough to call > >> > > it post-alpha or pre-beta or something like that. So I'd like to > >> > > invite > >> > > all of you maintainers to participate in building 64 bit packages, > >> > > foremost those packages other packages rely upon, like libraries. > >> > > If you have a 64 bit machine, please try the test release and see if > >> > > you can build your packages. For the time being, just download > >> > > ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwin/64bit/setup64.exe, install the test distro > >> > > (what's already existing of it) and do your worst ;) > >> > > >> > Great stuff. Thanks to the kind person who contributed a mintty package. > >> > >> That's your package ;) I just added a source package for licensing > >> reasons. > > > > To be more clear, I simply took the mintty binary you provided a couple > > of days ago and tar'ed it up. It's not *really* a serious mintty binary > > package. > > I've now uploaded a cygport-built mintty 1.2-beta1-1 package. > > (I've also run ./GEN-sware in > /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin/64bit. This threw a bunch of errors > such as "not enough package files in 64bit/release/gcc", but the > resulting setup.ini looks ok, so I guess those errors are expected?)
Yes, they are. Thanks for the new mintty package! Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
