On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 12:00:46AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:48:12PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: >>On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500 >>> Subject: nuke cygwin legacy? >> >>Greetings, All, >> >>> Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5 >>> support so I'm wondering if anyone has any objections to removing >>> 1.5 from cygwin.com. >>> >>> I was going to suggest this a few months ago and mention that the Cygwin >>> Time Machine was an alternative but it looks like that service is no >>> longer available. >> >>That is incorrect. The Cygwin Time Machine is still up and actively >>collecting updates. I have been having internet connectivity issues as of >>late, but those (hopefully) should have (mostly) been resolved. >>If you can't get to the Time Machine, wait a few minutes and try again. > >Thanks for the update. I'd tried a few times in the last month and was >never able to get through. It works now though, as you say.
Btw, if you want to send out an announcement about The Cygwin Time Machine to cygwin-announce, that would be fine with me. cgf
