On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 06:48:12PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote: >On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:41:36 -0500 >> Subject: nuke cygwin legacy? > >Greetings, All, > >> Corinna +1'ed my suggestion that it was time to remove cygwin 1.5 >> support so I'm wondering if anyone has any objections to removing >> 1.5 from cygwin.com. >> >> I was going to suggest this a few months ago and mention that the Cygwin >> Time Machine was an alternative but it looks like that service is no >> longer available. > >That is incorrect. The Cygwin Time Machine is still up and actively >collecting updates. I have been having internet connectivity issues as of >late, but those (hopefully) should have (mostly) been resolved. >If you can't get to the Time Machine, wait a few minutes and try again.
Thanks for the update. I'd tried a few times in the last month and was never able to get through. It works now though, as you say. cgf
