On Nov 3 08:55, Charles Wilson wrote: > On 11/3/2011 8:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >I hoped that somebody who voted on the package would do the final > >GTG, but in vain it seems. > > Sorry...I had intended to, but got swamped with other stuff. :-( > > >Anyway, I just had a look. The packaging now looks basically good. One > >issue I still have with the package is the big number of non-standard > >binaries in /usr/bin. > > > >Is it really necessary to have all the binaries as user-accessible > >binaries in /usr/bin? Or are many of the binaries just called from > >another (or other) binaries which serve as the primary UI? What also > >bugs me are the generic names of the binaries. Plotstuff, merge-index, > >tablist, tabsort, checktree, ... This all sounds not much like > >astronomer stuff. > >So, I would prefer to split the binaries into two groups: > > > >- UI binary (or binaries) into /usr/bin > > > >- Helper binaries into /usr/share/astrometry/bin > > FHS says that architecture-dependent files should go under /usr/lib/ > not /usr/share...so > > /usr/lib/astrometry/bin
Uh, yes, indeed. Thanks for spotting that. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
