-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no positive > votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there were any > interest > in having it in cygwin, there would have been a positive vote. I understand > that 5 are required.
On 14 November, Corinna explained[1] that you (or someone else) will need to ITP the yet-unpackaged dependencies as well before this can be seriously considered. AFAICS that hasn't happened yet, so I think the question of interest is still moot. [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2008-11/msg00100.html Yaakov -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkllMzEACgkQpiWmPGlmQSMHjQCeO7PiT+hAq+tyrpbklIzvd1Pw 4CgAnjO+lio1ZvoUytywwap+liRydHhc =oKLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
