> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:26 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ITP] Macaulay2 1.1 > Reply-To: [email protected] > > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 01:04:39PM -0600, Daniel R. Grayson wrote: > >I submitted an ITP for Macaulay 2 on Nov 11 and there have been no > >positive votes since then. I would have thought that by now, if there > >were any interest in having it in cygwin, there would have been a > >positive vote. I understand that 5 are required. > > I don't really grok this paragraph. The point of voting is to see if > there is interest. If no one voted then, yes, that would indicate > that there was no interest.
Sorry, perhaps I should have mentioned that the number of replies to my initial message seemed to indicate some interest. By the way, Macaulay 2 is comparable to Singular, which is included in Cygwin.
