On Jul 25 06:55, Phil Nelson wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2008 12:21:22 am Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > No, they aren't. The reason for this effect is that in 1.5, the user > > and group ownership, as well as the permissions were ignored by default > > (CYGWIN=nosmbntsec). > > Thanks. And are we starting a FAQ for things like this for 1.7? Such a > change in the security model between 1.5 and 1.7 is likely to generate > many questions.
Sure, and I'm three-quarter through the new documentation. FAQ didn't see any changes yet. The current unfinished state of the docs can be marveled at under http://cygwin.com/1.7/cygwin-ug-net.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
