On Apr 8 17:39, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:07:26PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >With a dash? cygwin-ng? Like syslog-ng. I was going to suggest this > >too, but I didn't want to copy the naming too bluntly. > > We actually use "ng" internally to Netapp. I actually wanted to call my > project either "ds9" or "voyager" but I got vetoed.
I assume Netapp didn't want to risk a law suite with CBS... > >I guess we should use "cygwin-notasnewbutstillnewenough". I'm still > >more leaning towards cygwin-2008. You shouldn't have suggested the > >name. It's all your fault. > > I hate the name! Hate it! > > But I don't really care. cygwin-2008 is fine with me. However, I > predict that cgf-2012 will probably be grumbling about that name > eventually. Looks like Brian made this whole naming discussion obsolete two years ago... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
