On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:43:56AM -0000, Dave Korn wrote: >On 19 March 2007 02:41, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >>> How about /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/man? >> >> Idealy, that path would need to be added to MANPATH, and if it were >> added, doing a 'man 3 basename' may turn up the MinGW implementation. > > Yes, but don't those two factors mitigate each other? IOW, if someone has >manually added that path to MANPATH, it kind of suggests that they /want/ to >get the mingw man pages...?
I think specifying "man mingw-basename" also suggests the same thing and probably would result in slightly less puzzlement for the end user. cgf
