On 19 March 2007 02:41, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> How about /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/man? > > Idealy, that path would need to be added to MANPATH, and if it were > added, doing a 'man 3 basename' may turn up the MinGW implementation.
Yes, but don't those two factors mitigate each other? IOW, if someone has
manually added that path to MANPATH, it kind of suggests that they /want/ to
get the mingw man pages...?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
