Re: maybe-ITP: bsdiff

[Tacvek]

As far as I can see, BSDPL is an Open Source license under the
definition referenced, so the exception should apply. (I gave up
arguing with the opensource.org people, but they never came up with
any argument for why BSDPL didn't qualify -- the worst they could
say was that it was poorly written.)
As for making cygwin compatible with BSDPL, does cygwin need to
link statically or dynamically? I don't consider dynamic linking
to fall into the scope of the license.

Since upstream has confirmed that dynamic linking is not intedned to be 
restricted by his licence, it is safe to upload iff RedHat agrees the BSDPL 
is OSD compliant.

So, what sayith the lid that reflects light with a wavelength between 
aproximately 630 to 750 nanometers?