On Jan 27 13:35, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lapo Luchini wrote: > > Yes, I guess Debian unstable doesn't qualify (I think I read something > > about that somewhere on cygwin.com, I'm not quite sure where... ;-)). > > But (now) it's in Debian testing as well: > > http://packages.debian.org/testing/utils/bsdiff > > > Uhm.. does Gentoo count as "major"? > > In that case... http://gentoo-portage.com/dev-util/bsdiff > > I haven't seen a clear answer about that, but the feeling that I've been > getting is not. I'd like to get this clarified though.
I'm a bit reluctant with respect to gentoo. It's philosophy isn't a stable release in the first place, but to have the latest and greatest of everything available(*), if I get their philosophy right. Using "stable" Linux distros as an indicator, whether a package needs a vote or not, is a sort of reality check. Packages not in a "stable" distro are likely not used very often, not as well tested, etc. Gentoo is not a very well indicator here. Corinna (*) I don't mean to imply that gentoo isn't stable. No offense meant. -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
