> From: Christopher Faylor > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -0000, John Morrison wrote: > >>From: Christopher Faylor > >>I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I > >>might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a > >>time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelated > >>packages. > > > >Even then, it might be a good idea to only have one package ITP at a > >time, but to state _why_ this package is needed? (ie, ITP help2man > >Required for future ITP gtypist) > > That would be the "demonstrated need".
Oops sorry Chris, missed that. J.
