On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -0000, John Morrison wrote: >>From: Christopher Faylor >>I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I >>might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a >>time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelated >>packages. > >Even then, it might be a good idea to only have one package ITP at a >time, but to state _why_ this package is needed? (ie, ITP help2man >Required for future ITP gtypist)
That would be the "demonstrated need". cgf
