Looks like it doesn't like the bang pattern. What version of Haddock
are you using?
0.8. Why, is it safe to use Haddock 2 in the GHC build yet?-)
Well, it is possible with some effort, so I just wanted to make sure
it's not a bug.
How much effort? Simon M's new ghc-path package gives you
easy access to the ghc installation paths, and as long as all
Haddock invocations are run with the final ghc, after ghc has
bootstrapped itself, the files ought to be useable and consistent, right?
Anyway, I'd welcome a heads-up here when it is time to
switch - it is easier to have just one version of Haddock!-)
Claus
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
