Checking back, I see that fgl was removed from extra-packages,
but apparently, that doesn't keep it from being built (or not, in this
case). Should I remove libraries/fgl, or should the build system
avoid building things not mentioned in boot- or extra-packages
by default?
And shouldn't Haddock be more forgiving in parsing, not to
mention helpful in its error messages:
Running Haddock for fgl-5.4.2.0...
dist\build\tmp\Data\Graph\Inductive\PatriciaTree.hs:"dist\\build\\tmp\\Data\\Graph\\Inductive\\PatriciaTree.hs":
65:15: Parse error
There aren't any Haddock comments after the header, and
none in line 65, as far as I can see.
And shouldn't fgl be fixed anyway, as the STABLE builds
have been tripping over this as well?
Or is my fgl not uptodate, because 'darcs-all pull' cares
about membership in extra-packages, even if make doesn't?
Claus
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
