Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:50:24PM +1000, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
In any case, I have no idea what happened to num009.
Doh, we now have 2 num009 tests.
Hmm, is that even supported?
I suspect the new lib/Numeric/num009 is
the one that is failing? What is the output of it?
Actual stdout output differs from expected:
--- ./lib/Numeric/num009.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20 15:10:17.000000000
+1000
+++ ./lib/Numeric/num009.run.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20
15:10:17.000000000 +1000
@@ -1 +1,19 @@
+sind
+-0.6452512852657808
+-0.7469218912594929
+sinf
+0.6565767
+-0.7710884
+cosd
+0.7639704044417284
+-0.6649117899070088
+cosf
+0.7542593
+0.63672805
+tand
+-0.8446024630198841
+1.123339821307656
+tanf
+0.87049204
+-1.2110169
Done
Roman
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
