I get the following two failures:
Unexpected failures:
ghci024(ghci)
num009(normal)
Recently, I tend to get unexpected failures every time I pull in
patches. What happened to the policy of running validate before pushing?
I thought we agreed that was a good idea?
In any case, I have no idea what happened to num009. ghci024 fails with:
--- ./ghci/scripts/ghci024.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20
14:42:34.000000000 +1000
+++ ./ghci/scripts/ghci024.run.stdout.normalised 2008-05-20
14:42:34.000000000 +1000
@@ -97,9 +97,9 @@
active package flags: none
packages currently loaded:
base
+ rts
integer
ghc-prim
- rts
-- :set -package ghc
active package flags:
-package ghc
@@ -123,6 +123,6 @@
containers-0.1
array-0.1
base
+ rts
integer
ghc-prim
- rts
Fixing the first diff is trivial but the second one is harder. Perhaps
the package lists should be sorted before comparing? Or is the order
important and this is actually bad?
Roman
_______________________________________________
Cvs-ghc mailing list
Cvs-ghc@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ghc
