Dear George,
I kindly ask you to read carefully what I am proposing for CRMdig. I
argue that I provide new evidence on issue 547.
I had carefully studied the text for issue 547, and propose a viable
alternative to your arguments (which we had shared then) already in
harmony with CRMsci for D9 and D11. Therefore I propose not to delete
concepts we will possibly need to reintroduce, and are not backwards
compatible.
Second, I have completed the Area concepts with the missing parts from
the applied software. It is a generic concept in line with METS, a very
important standard.
Finally, the fact that the Annotation model appears to be competitive
with another annotation model does not make it obsolete per se. It makes
use of Named Graph logic, which is very elegant and compact. Van der
Soempel personally told me that they made the Annotation Model as it is
because Named Graphs were not mature at that time.
Note that I am editor of CRMdig and domain expert. I do not agree with
this judgement:
"Annotation is an important area of digital humanities work. This
modeling is very early modelling and misses out on many efforts since
then. It is not informed by recent work and it is not a profound
ontological contribution anyhow. "
If we drop a requirement for these deletions, we can directly review the
harmonization with the other models. I argue that my proposals are
already mature enough.
Please let us review this together.
Kind regards,
Martin
On 9/6/2025 12:41 PM, George Bruseker via Crm-sig wrote:
Dear all,
Here is the homework for closing out issue 547 which has been
undertaken by the working group George, Steve, Pavlos.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u3haQXJit9speJaTyE7t9bSwLi8jlnPwmioVhM0zDz8/edit?tab=t.0
Work on CRMdig has been paused to allow extensive discussion of CRMsci
and inf. Now that that is over we would like to bring CRMdig into
harmonization with 7.1.3 BEFORE any other new modelling work is
proposed on the standard, so that we have a set of usable extensions
(official with serialization).
In the session we can then broach new modelling proposals which can be
considered for the next official release.
We will post the latest version of the documentation before the
meeting reflecting this work. This is essentially a cleaning exercise
BEFORE doing new modelling ideas and exercises so that there is a
functional official version that is in line with our present base
model, 7.1.3.
Best,
George
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
--
------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr
Honorary Head of the
Center for Cultural Informatics
Information Systems Laboratory
Institute of Computer Science
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece
Email: [email protected]
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://cidoc-crm.org/crm-sig-mailing-list
