El día 25 de marzo de 2012 13:01, Andrew Chadwick <[email protected]> escribió: > On 25/03/12 16:22, Manuel Quiñones wrote: >> Now I see some movement in the list regarding the ORA spec. I wonder >> if anyone is working on the animation draft for inclusion: >> >> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/OpenRaster/Draft/Animation >> >> What I need is a bit different of what's described there. [...] > > I think anything marked as Proposal was probably intended as fair game. > Most are still quite vague without any of the technical detail needed to > be a formal part of the spec. If you want to work on it, go ahead! > > Personally I don't really think of OpenRaster as an animation format, > but if it can be made to work as one in a way that's compatible with > static image editors (ideally in a way that doesn't break when edited by > a static image editor (good luck[1]!)), why not? I think in order to > keep the formal, baseline part of the spec nice and light, animation > would have to be an extension - though possibly a very standard > extension if it's well specified, would work with more than one app, and > seems sound to a consensus of animators.
OK I will work on a proposal spec as an extension then. > [1] The spec seems to omit any mention of programs preserving files, > elements and attributes they don't understand to avoid screwing up other > apps. I have this vague recollection it was discussed once though; and > core MyPaint, er, doesn't do that. I'm not entirely sure what the > mechanism would be; suggestions welcome. Yes I have seen the same non preservation issue in the making of my film. I added custom tags in the ORA in my MyPaint branch. Once the animator started workng on it, I was saying "don't open it again in MyPaint or in GIMP (using the ORA plugin) or it will mess your file! Cheers, -- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
