The recipient of this message has exceeded their message limits, they have not received the full text of your message
Ray Dillinger wrote: > There's a lot to be said for "simple", especially when it would > require invasive (and expensive) monitoring to implement a per- > song download fee. that is actually one of the main plus points of this, and privacy is one of the reasons it's been implemented here (germany) - an invasive monitoring scheme would violate our privacy laws. yes, we have laws that actually give citizen a right to privacy. > BTW; I don't generally download music: I tried it and the sound > quality of MP3 is crap. I don't use windows; the engineering > quality of the product is crap. But I'd still rather pay taxes > on hard drives than have snooping software installed in Windows. > See, given the choice, I'd rather have taxes rather than snooping > software accepted as "normal". -- At least for now. yepp. if you accept that you have to pay for music copies, then a flat fee is the less invasive and more privacy-conscious option.
