The recipient of this message has exceeded their message limits, they have not received the full text of your message
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 01:55:45PM +0200, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > But why should this be limited to the book stores? The same should go for > laudries etc. In this sense we *are* talking about privileges to those > dealing with 1st Amendment protected material, like the press and book > stores. Declan's problem obviously is that while free speech has > constitutional protection in itself, here *privacy* is protected only via > extension of the 1st Amendment protection. This isn't enough. That's a nice way to word it, and sums my thoughts up nicely. -Declan
