On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 12:33, rcc wrote: > On 15 Feb 2003 03:04:00 -0800 > Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 02:54, rcc wrote: > > > > > I could understand it. > > > > > > I don't, though I haven't yet seen what the author gives for > > > reasons. I'll do that today. > > > > > I saw a reasonable number of persons stuck with the top bar of a > > window out of reach. > > I guessed that this could be the reason, but I hoped that there would be > a more "acceptable" one. This is exactly the form of progress I don't > like to see in Linux, ie protecting the user from himself by taking away > options. But so it goes...
Join the dark side! Use sawfish! Go on, you know you want to. ;) > > It seems that Alt-click to move a window is not > > very well known. > > Agreed, and one could argue that 800x600 or even lower screens are only > used by a very small fraction of the userbase. Most people probably > won't even notice that they can't drag windows upwards off screen. Except if you look at those surveys based on webpages that record the resolution of people who visit them, 800x600 ranks quite high. -- adamw
