tarvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 10 September 2002 05:58 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > Jim Tarvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Monday 09 September 2002 05:56 am, you wrote: > > > > Jim Tarvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > A network.img from cooker 2002-05-09 works on a box where a > > > > > network.img from rc2 fails.
[...] > > > The differences are noted above but they are > > > reverse name lookup on DNS succeeds on the old version > > > the old version is pre10 instead of pre11 > > > > what difference? what are you talking about? the logs you show > > are from a successful installation of the tulip driver, I see no > > problem. what's your problem? please be descriptive.. > > The network does not come up Please give me the logs of the version for which the network does not come up. > reverse name lookup on DNS failed (this succeeds on the 2002-05-09 cooker > version) I'll have a look but the code has not changed. > Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre11 (May 11, 2002) (pre10 March 8, > 2002 on the version that works) > > Nor will it come up after a full install What do you mean? When you reboot the installed system, it doesn't work? If it's the case, it's a driver problem, and I don't see why you report this as a network.img problem :-(. > As I said in a later email, the tulip card works on a VIA motherboard (DFI > AD70) but fails on a SiS motherboard (K7S6A). I was concerned because I have > a lot ot tulips in boxes I am planning to upgrade to 9.0. I have relatively > few SiS/Tulip combinations and I quietly ordered a couple of VIA motherboards > to replace those if I have problems. > > rc1 installed on VIA/Celeron/tulip without incident. > > I am content to write off the K7S6A motherboard for a variety of reaons but I > did run 8.2 on that board for months without incident. And if you use latest cooker with 8.2 kernel? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
