On Tuesday 10 September 2002 05:58 am, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Jim Tarvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 09 September 2002 05:56 am, you wrote: > > > Jim Tarvid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > A network.img from cooker 2002-05-09 works on a box where a > > > > network.img from rc2 fails. > > > > > > > > Network card is a Netgear LC82C169C > > > > > > What's the problem? Please report useful information from > > > consoles #3 and #4. > > > > Console #3 > > PCI: device 11ad 0002 is "Lite-On|LNETx" tulip > > have to insmod tulip > > succeeded tulip > > NET: alias eth0 tulip > > have to insmod af-packet > > succeeded af-packet > > guessing netmask > > configuring device eth0 ip:12.43.222.7 nm: 255.255.254.0 nw: 12.43.222.0 > > bc 12.43.223.255 > > reverse name lookup on self failed > > reverse name lookup on DNS failed (this succeeds on the 2002-05-09 cooker > > version) > > Console #4 > > Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre11 (May 11, 2002) (pre10 March 8, > > 2002 on the version that works) > > PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 00:0c.0 > > tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 3000 status 7829 advertising 01e1 > > eth0: Lite-On 82C168 PNIC rev 32 at 0xe0000 00:A0:CC:DC:27:63:28:01 > > Setting full duplex based on MII #1 link partner capability of 41e1 > > > > The differences are noted above but they are > > reverse name lookup on DNS succeeds on the old version > > the old version is pre10 instead of pre11 > > what difference? what are you talking about? the logs you show > are from a successful installation of the tulip driver, I see no > problem. what's your problem? please be descriptive..
The network does not come up reverse name lookup on DNS failed (this succeeds on the 2002-05-09 cooker version) Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre11 (May 11, 2002) (pre10 March 8, 2002 on the version that works) Nor will it come up after a full install As I said in a later email, the tulip card works on a VIA motherboard (DFI AD70) but fails on a SiS motherboard (K7S6A). I was concerned because I have a lot ot tulips in boxes I am planning to upgrade to 9.0. I have relatively few SiS/Tulip combinations and I quietly ordered a couple of VIA motherboards to replace those if I have problems. rc1 installed on VIA/Celeron/tulip without incident. I am content to write off the K7S6A motherboard for a variety of reaons but I did run 8.2 on that board for months without incident. Jim Tarvid
