On Monday 12 August 2002 09:05 pm, Ryan Little wrote:
> > 1. Say CD1 is a minimal installer and a file system, rudimentary, ready
> > to go. ( And yes, I've actually created such a thing on contract for a
> > company in the Northwest so I know this pretty well... )
> >
> > 2. You do the "install" and partition, and format, and BLLLLLAAAAMMMM !
> The only problem I could see with not having it in an RPM is if for some
> reason it needed to be upgraded (i.e. a release upgrade on which the fs
> changed, or a bug fix.) It's much easier to upgrade things with RPM (If it's
> done correctly).
Um...
Are you assuming there would be no rpm database of what is on the base
file system IN the base file system ?
???
;)
-AEF
