On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 22:45, David Walser wrote: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Olivier Thauvin wrote: > >> > Le Vendredi 13 Juin 2003 17:43, Guillaume Cottenceau a �crit : > >> >> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> > Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead? > >> >> > >> >> We try to not put "any" library, when there is no program > >> >> requiring it in the distro.. > >> > >> There can't be a program requiring it until it's packaged. > > > > Don't be like that! You perfectly know that it can be packaged > > when we need it for a program we want to add in the distro.. > > Great! So let's get it packaged then.
Why? I don't think anyone suggested that they wanted to package a program which required perl-OpenGL, did they? -- adamw
