Olivier Thauvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Vendredi 13 Juin 2003 17:43, Guillaume Cottenceau a �crit : > > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Could we maybe get perl-OpenGL packaged instead? > > > > We try to not put "any" library, when there is no program > > requiring it in the distro.. > > I do not agree with you, Guillaume. Someone can use the lib for a personnal > works. Somes are easy to package and maintain, no programs in distro use it > but you can can need it for your stuff.
Yes I know that. But cooker/contrib are already large and contain many many things. > If you begin in this way, you can say lot of rpm an not usefull and should be > removed. Not so many, I think. > Add to this someone can be happy to find the lib allready packaged when it > build a rpm which use it. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
