On Monday 10 March 2003 21:33, George Mitchell wrote: > > I have nothing against proprietary software in general or soundfonts in > particular. I only find it odd that cards that provide /dev/sequencer > support under free software should see that support discontinued when > the source is freely available. So now the question becomes 'Does > anybody out there have /dev/sequencer support without having to use > soundfonts?' You have it backwards. AFAIK: On the sblive, you *have* to use soundfonts. It cannot synthesise notes itself. AFAIK it is a hardware limitation. On other cards, it might be different.
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Duncan
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... danny
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Danny Tholen
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... George Mitchell
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Getting video card make... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be ... Adam Williamson
- Re: [Cooker] Make video card mfrs ca... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed thomas
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Jan Ciger
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Thomas Backlund
