On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 09:14:50PM +0000, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote: > Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > What do you think about the following patch instead: > > > > diff --git a/config.guess b/config.guess > > index 160ecf0..b07202e 100755 > > --- a/config.guess > > +++ b/config.guess > > @@ -1378,8 +1378,11 @@ EOF > > BePC:Haiku:*:*) # Haiku running on Intel PC compatible. > > GUESS=i586-pc-haiku > > ;; > > - x86_64:Haiku:*:*) > > - GUESS=x86_64-unknown-haiku > > + arm64:Haiku:*:*) > > + GUESS=aarch64-unknown-haiku > > + ;; > > + arm:Haiku:*:* | riscv64:Haiku:*:* | x86_64:Haiku:*:*) > > + GUESS=$UNAME_MACHINE-unknown-haiku > > ;; > > SX-4:SUPER-UX:*:*) > > GUESS=sx4-nec-superux$UNAME_RELEASE > > diff --git a/testsuite/config-guess.data b/testsuite/config-guess.data > > index 7065a41..102e581 100644 > > . > . > > Looks good to me :-) > > ... actually, I just double checked arm64, and we actually keep our uname > platform consistent with linux via aarch64. So that one can also be combined > too: > > (aka arm:Haiku:*:* | aarch64:Haiku:*:* | riscv64:Haiku:*:* | x86_64:Haiku:*:*) > > Source: > https://cgit.haiku-os.org/haiku/tree/src/system/libroot/posix/sys/uname.c#n55 > > Sorry for the mistake there. We call aarch64 "arm64" everywhere except where > it > counts :-)
OK, could you post the final patch, please? -- ldv
