Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > What do you think about the following patch instead: > > diff --git a/config.guess b/config.guess > index 160ecf0..b07202e 100755 > --- a/config.guess > +++ b/config.guess > @@ -1378,8 +1378,11 @@ EOF > BePC:Haiku:*:*) # Haiku running on Intel PC compatible. > GUESS=i586-pc-haiku > ;; > - x86_64:Haiku:*:*) > - GUESS=x86_64-unknown-haiku > + arm64:Haiku:*:*) > + GUESS=aarch64-unknown-haiku > + ;; > + arm:Haiku:*:* | riscv64:Haiku:*:* | x86_64:Haiku:*:*) > + GUESS=$UNAME_MACHINE-unknown-haiku > ;; > SX-4:SUPER-UX:*:*) > GUESS=sx4-nec-superux$UNAME_RELEASE > diff --git a/testsuite/config-guess.data b/testsuite/config-guess.data > index 7065a41..102e581 100644
. . Looks good to me :-) ... actually, I just double checked arm64, and we actually keep our uname platform consistent with linux via aarch64. So that one can also be combined too: (aka arm:Haiku:*:* | aarch64:Haiku:*:* | riscv64:Haiku:*:* | x86_64:Haiku:*:*) Source: https://cgit.haiku-os.org/haiku/tree/src/system/libroot/posix/sys/uname.c#n55 Sorry for the mistake there. We call aarch64 "arm64" everywhere except where it counts :-) -- Alex