On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 07:49:44AM -0500, Elad Lahav wrote:
> QNX reports the architecture as aarch64le (on little-endian machines),
> which matches neither aarch64 nor aarch64_be.
> I don't know how standardized these architecture names are supposed to
> be. This may be a trivial change to add or a contentious topic.
> Hopefully the former.
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to treat aarch64le as an alias to aarch64
like in the following patch:
diff --git a/config.sub b/config.sub
index 38f3d03..e0e1799 100755
--- a/config.sub
+++ b/config.sub
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ case $cpu-$vendor in
xscale-* | xscalee[bl]-*)
cpu=`echo "$cpu" | sed 's/^xscale/arm/'`
;;
- arm64-*)
+ arm64-* | aarch64le-*)
cpu=aarch64
;;
diff --git a/testsuite/config-sub.data b/testsuite/config-sub.data
index d911c5b..44bd2f1 100644
--- a/testsuite/config-sub.data
+++ b/testsuite/config-sub.data
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ aarch64_be-elf
aarch64_be-unknown-elf
aarch64_be-linux aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu
aarch64_be-unknown-elf aarch64_be-unknown-elf
aarch64_be-unknown-linux aarch64_be-unknown-linux-gnu
+aarch64le-qnx aarch64-unknown-qnx
abacus abacus-unknown-none
adobe68k m68010-adobe-scout
alliant fx80-alliant-none
--
ldv
