On 10/24/2013 14:04, Daniel Richard G. wrote: > On Wed, 2013 Oct 23 7:55-0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >> >> JonY you forget to mention that what Daniel is trying to do has >> already been tried once and long since abandoned in favor of using a >> cross compiler. Remember the -mno-cygwin conglomeration of ugliness? > > Well, that's using a single toolchain to generate both Cygwin *and* > MinGW binaries. And I can see why that would be ugly. > > If you think that's what I'm trying to do, however, then you need to > re-read the thread. >
You are doing exactly that, reviving it, and adding more kludge. Instead of CC="gcc -mno-cygwin", you are doing it by CC="i686-pc-mingw32-gcc", expecting even config.guess detection to bend over.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
