On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:09 AM, JonY wrote: > On 10/23/2013 13:49, Daniel Richard G. wrote: >> It's a situation where the two "platforms" are not all that different--- >> the system can run binaries from both---and avoiding the need to >> rigorously cross-compile from one to the other is a big convenience. >> >> Obviously, Cygwin vs. MinGW programs is a different comparison from 32- >> bit vs. 64-bit programs, but it's close enough to allow the same >> argument to be made. >> > > No close enough for you, stop this misinformation. You ARE already cross > compiling, you cannot mix code from either platforms, even if they both > run on Windows.
JonY you forget to mention that what Daniel is trying to do has already been tried once and long since abandoned in favor of using a cross compiler. Remember the -mno-cygwin conglomeration of ugliness? -- Earnie -- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd _______________________________________________ config-patches mailing list config-patches@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/config-patches
