tibrewalpratik17 commented on code in PR #14494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14494#discussion_r1850938515


##########
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/api/resources/PinotSegmentRestletResource.java:
##########
@@ -425,13 +426,14 @@ public SuccessResponse reloadSegment(
   /**
    * Helper method to find the existing table based on the given table name 
(with or without type suffix) and segment
    * name.
-   * TODO: Real-time table might also contain uploaded segments (not with LLC 
name), which is not handled here.
    */
   private String getExistingTable(String tableName, String segmentName) {
     TableType tableType = 
TableNameBuilder.getTableTypeFromTableName(tableName);
     if (tableType == null) {
       // Derive table type from segment name if the given table name doesn't 
have type suffix
-      tableType = LLCSegmentName.isLLCSegment(segmentName) ? 
TableType.REALTIME : TableType.OFFLINE;

Review Comment:
   Yeah but then should we start enforcing tableNameWithType or add this patch 
to fallback to extracting using segment name on a best effort basis? Worst case 
if segment naming is incorrect, we end up throwing TableNotFoundException which 
is okay i guess.
   
   Long term maybe we should migrate all the APIs to a standard naming 
convention (using tableNameWithType always) but that seems to be a bigger 
alignment. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to