davecromberge commented on code in PR #14373:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14373#discussion_r1848063380


##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/segment/processing/aggregator/DistinctCountCPCSketchAggregator.java:
##########
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ public DistinctCountCPCSketchAggregator() {
   }
 
   @Override
-  public Object aggregate(Object value1, Object value2) {
+  public Object aggregate(Object value1, Object value2, Map<String, String> 
functionParameters) {

Review Comment:
   @gortiz I have limited understanding but it appears that this is fundamental 
to the task configuration:
   
https://github.com/apache/pinot/blob/master/pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/minion/PinotTaskConfig.java#L55-L57
   
   This is where the task configuration is sourced and then parsed out based on 
prefixes and postfixes.  I agree that splitting strings in this manner is 
cumbersome for complex parameters but don't quite see how to fit a JsonObject 
into this framework.  Do you have suggestions?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to