siddharthteotia commented on code in PR #12223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/12223#discussion_r1462929728


##########
pinot-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/spi/utils/FALFInterner.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.pinot.spi.utils;
+
+
+import com.google.common.collect.Interner;
+import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.function.BiPredicate;
+import java.util.function.ToIntFunction;
+
+/**
+ * Fixed-size Array-based, Lock-Free Interner.
+ *
+ * !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! READ THE PARAGRAPH BELOW BEFORE USING THIS CLASS 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ * This class is technically not thread-safe. Therefore if it's called from 
multiple
+ * threads, it should either be used with proper synchronization (in the same 
way as
+ * you would use e.g. a HashMap), or under the following conditions:
+ * all the objects being interned are not just immutable, but also final (that 
is, all
+ * their fields used in equals() and hashCode() methods are explicitly marked 
final).
+ * That's to ensure that all threads always see the same contents of these 
objects. If
+ * this rule is not followed, using this class from multiple threads may lead 
to strange
+ * non-deterministic errors. Note that objects with all private fields that 
are not
+ * marked final, or immutable collections created via 
Collection.unmodifiableMap() etc,
+ * don't qualify.
+ * 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ *
+ * This interner is intended to be used when either:
+ * (a) distribution of values among the objects to be interned make them not 
suitable
+ *     for standard interners
+ * (b) speed is more important than ultimate memory savings
+ *
+ * Problem (a) occurs when both the total number of objects AND the number of 
unique
+ * values is large. For example, there are 1M strings that look like "a", "a", 
"b", "b",
+ * "c", "c", ... - that is, for each unique value there are only two separate 
objects.
+ * Another problematic case is when "a" has 1000 copies, "b" has 900 copies, 
etc.,
+ * but in the last few hundred thousand objects each one is unique. In both 
cases, if
+ * we use a standard interner such as a Guava interner or a ConcurrentHashMap 
to
+ * deduplicate such objects, the amount of memory consumed by the interner 
itself to

Review Comment:
   For the production case validation done, what is the footprint of this data 
structure itself ?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to